September 15, 2007

When the Housing Clock Stops Ticking: Why the Median Price is Going up While Sales are Going down.

If you haven’t noticed, Los Angeles returned to its previous median record price of $550,000 last month. Before you scratch your head in dismay, let us take a look at what is really happening. As you know, higher priced homes are still moving while lower priced homes are stagnant thus skewing the numbers. If a home doesn’t sell, it doesn’t show up in the data. Similar to taking an immensely hard mathematics course where half the class drops out, but those that remain push grades higher. When calculating the final overall class performance the statistics show the best of the best and those that stuck the course out, but what of the students that dropped out? Well as you can see from the Real Homes of Genius examples, prices are coming down. So what do we make of this seemingly contradictory information?

The Sales Cycle

This chart shows sales for Los Angeles County over the past 7 years. As I point out in the above chart, each January and February we hit a trough because of the slower selling brought on by fall and winter. This has been the case for each consecutive year since 2000 and is actually part of the normal housing cycle. But what do we have here appearing in summer of 2007? It appears that we have hit a trough 5 months early. In fact, summer sales numbers are looking more like seasonal sales numbers of winter. This chart is also telling because it shows a consistent pattern over time. Those that don’t believe in housing cycles are spinning in their chair wondering what happened this summer. Normally a strong spring and summer selling season allows for the lower numbers in the fall and winter. This will not happen this year. Unless of course we see a radical jump in sales in the next few months. This data is also a good indicator of where we are heading. Keep in mind the data reported is from sales that close after escrow. This data can lag 1 to 2 months. So what we are currently seeing in the actual finalized recorded sales is probably from July to early August. Well of course the mortgage blow out just occurred and credit standards are much tighter since then. So guess what this will do for sales at the slowest time of the year? Either way, this is a much necessary correction and that is why any housing pundits thinking we are going to have some bounce back in the next few months is simply hallucinating and not following the trend.

I’ve been getting some e-mails about timing the market. There are many ways to valuate housing prices. As we previously discussed with 3 housing valuation methods, every city in Southern California is overpriced. If you haven’t noticed the media is now using the terms “housing slump” and “credit crunch” as if they’ve been talking about it for years. Too bad even as late as January and February of this year, they were still carrying the housing banner. Using rhetoric such as “booming” and “amazing” when talking about housing. I’ve seen a few articles pointing out that housing bears have unfairly criticized the media as this New Yorker online piece. Since they link up to a few places including our site, I feel it is important to state why I have been critical of the mainstream media in the past. Clearly, they are now carrying the housing bear flag and there is no problem finding populist information outlets dissecting the housing market. My main issue was during the boom, they kept giving air time to raging housing bulls that have led us into this current market. Dean Baker’s recent study does a great job researching the entire housing bubble and also pointing out that media airtime in the past few years has not been fair and balanced. I recommend you read the entire paper as a primer to this housing bubble. But here is some of the data found regarding media citations:

Media Citations (New York Times and Washington Post) on the Housing Market, 2005-2006

Bulls

Citations

David Lereah, NAR

1796

Doug Duncan, Mortgage Bankers Association

397

David Seiders, National Association of Homebuilders

652

Total

2845

Bears

Total

Robert Schiller, Yale University

516

Edward Leamer, UCLA

88

Dean Baker, Center for Economic Policy Research

248

Total

852

*source: Dean Baker, Midsummer Meltdown August 2007

And regarding the New Yorker, I do agree with the author that many journalists are now scrambling to be first in line to disseminate housing information to the public. In fairness, the media reports what is happening yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Historian and prognosticators they are not.

Case and Point: High Priced Area and Low Priced Area

Back to the median housing price analysis, clearly housing sales have fallen off a cliff. In fact, Los Angeles County saw a 50 percent year-over-year drop in sales last month. Not exactly stellar numbers. Multiple converging factors combined to create a perfect stew of housing stagnation. For one, the credit markets are now tighter and sub-prime is now a thing of the past. Also, appreciation is now gone. So folks are deciding on holding off on buying homes especially with a sudden onslaught of negative media coverage. And something specific to California, August of 2005 saw the largest origination of adjustable rate mortgages at a whopping 70+ percent of all mortgages originated. Guess what was hot? 2/28 mortgages. And what was last month? That’s right, 2 years and now these people are facing larger payments with mortgages amortizing on different schedules. In addition, they no longer have the option of refinancing because this will push payments higher and the reason they took out these exotic loans is to squeeze into an overpriced home. Now why would they go for a higher payment even if they could? As I discussed back in July housing has hit its Minsky Moment.


Let us take at a few case examples for last month to show how higher priced areas are moving up while lower priced areas are getting hit.

Higher Priced Areas Moving Up:

Agoura Hills with a median of $975,000 is up 18.9 percent year-over-year.

Arcadia with a median of $752,000 is up 19.3 percent year-over-year.

Hermosa Beach with a median of $1,255,000 is up 15.6 percent year-over-year.

La Canada Flintridge with a median of $1,455,000 is up 7.4 percent year-over-year

Wow! The housing party is still going strong. Why look at data when all 10,000,000 folks in Los Angeles live in these areas. Let us take a look at some lower to middle priced areas:

Artesia with a median of $370,000 is down 26 percent year-over-year.

Baldwin Park with a median of $400,000 is down 11.1 percent year-over-year.

El Monte (South) - with a median of $381,00 is down 20.3 percent year-over-year.

Montebello – with a median of $535,000 is down 10,8 percent year-over-year

You clearly see the pattern and why the median price is skewed higher. For one, more sales are happening in the higher priced areas so they have a larger subset. Sales in lower areas are facing intense drops in sales and downward pricing action. Could this be because many of the past buyers bought with sub-prime loans that are no longer available? I doubt anyone in Palos Verdes would avoid buying their dream home because of a lack of sub-prime loans. An interesting thing to note is middle class neighborhoods are facing a stagnant market with prices trending down slowly but sales having a sudden stop. I expect that we will see the lower end get hammered first as it currently is and then have the middle areas tip over as well. The higher priced areas will be the last to adjust.

How low will we go?



Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

September 13, 2007

Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Downey. $100,000 off in 3 Months.


We’ve all heard about the reluctance of sellers to lower their prices even with the onslaught of negative housing news. Well today, we have a bank owned property that has no problem with dropping prices and dropping them fast. You may wonder why the median price in Los Angeles County is so outrageously high. Some out of state folks just assume everyone in this county of 10,000,000 people is making $200,000 a year and has no problem paying $547,500 for a starter home. Well we are quickly realizing as the tide pulls out that many recent homeowners bought places with convoluted mortgages that would make the Louisiana Purchase read like a kid’s book. In a previous post, we discussed that it is very easy for some families to fall into the debt trap. And the primordial need to own one’s place in America is so deep seated that some families will pay anything for having their name on the deed even if prices make absolutely no sense. So today per a reader’s request, we will examine the city of Downey. Today we Salute you Downey, with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

This home is a nice sized 3 bedroom home with 2 baths. Something that you would consider as a starter home in many parts of the country. So what is the price tag? $300,000? Nope. $400,000? Close. $500,000? Let us give it to you straight. The price of this home was initially listed at a whopping $727,500! This works out to $553 per square foot for a home that is listed at 1,315 square feet. This home is nearly 60 years old and is in a middle class area of Los Angeles. This isn’t a prime location like Santa Monica or Manhattan Beach. You are not overlooking the Pacific Ocean or nestling the hills in Pasadena. So why are they listing the home at 3 quarters of a million dollars? Welcome to Wonderland USA. We’ve already seen many homes get knocked down in price in Southern California. Very little is moving in lower to middle class neighborhoods even with price drops. Sales last month dropped a whopping 50 percent year-over-year in the region.

Let us take a look at the massive pricing action on this bank owned home:

Price Reduced: 06/01/07 -- $727,500 to $686,800
Price Reduced: 07/13/07 -- $686,800 to $652,500
Price Reduced: 09/02/07 -- $652,500 to $619,875

In the span of 3 months, this home is lowered by $107,625, or $37,875 per month. Now think about this for one second. Did this property actually lose $107,625 over the summer? Of course not. This again is the pie in the sky dreaming of banks trying to unload properties looking at yesteryear appraisals. Let us take a look at the sales history:

Sale History

02/21/2007: $23,600

01/19/2006: $640,000

08/24/2005: $542,500

We are quickly approaching the 2005 sales price. The 2006 sales price is absurd. Again, we are seeing the famed mortgage equity withdrawal action going on here with the $23,600 2nd taken out earlier this year. Assuming this home was purchased in 2006 with zero down, some lenders are probably out to the tune of $663,600. Yet people in Los Angeles make incomes to support this price right? Well let us look at the average household income for this immediate area:

Average/Household: $75,523

Keep in mind this income level is important because these are the people that will be buying these homes in the future. Let us humor the current lower sales price and run the numbers:

PITI: $4,367 - with 5 percent down ($30,993) and current jumbo rates on a 30 year fixed

Monthly Net Income: $4,904 (filing as married with 2 exemptions)

So this family is left with a disposable income of $537 after the housing payment. We haven't factored any other monthly revolving costs. They are only spending 89 percent of their net income on servicing their home. Everyone should take a look at the new rules being proposed by the FHASecure Act. Here is a piece from the CNN article:

It used to be you couldn't refinance into an FHA loan if you'd been delinquent in your payments for any reason. But with the FHASecure Act, delinquent homeowners qualify for an FHA-insured refi if they have:

  • A history of on-time payments for at least six months before their loans reset to higher rates
  • Interest rates scheduled to reset between June 2005 and December 2009
  • 3 percent equity in their home, or the cash equivalent
  • A sustained history of employment
  • Sufficient income to make their FHA-insured mortgage payment and all other obligations

Wow. Many folks in California are currently underwater. Meaning they have negative equity. Since most people in the last few years went 0, 3, or 5 percent down, that equity is now lost. Does that mean they don’t qualify? And what do they mean sufficient income? Does that mean they can have housing payments up to 99.9 percent of their net income and still qualify? Reading these guidelines, it seems like 100 percent of California isn’t going to participate in this bailout party. Here is another gem from the article:

The FHA will still insist that lenders verify borrowers' income and ensure that their total debt payments don't exceed 43 percent of their income or that their mortgage payment won't exceed 31 percent of income. If those ratios are exceeded, the lender must explain how the homeowner can compensate for that.

Say what? It is like building a home from the roof to the concrete foundation. It is all backwards. So now, they are going to actually verify income? In addition, look at those ratios in comparison to the scenarios we keep running. California is on its own here. Looking at many of these short-sales and pre-foreclosures, income ratios are no where in the hemisphere of the proposed legislation. Kevin Depew over Minyanville [hat tip exit] puts out a terrific daily post called the 5 Things You Need to Know. In the post, he talks about an article in the WSJ that encourages the Fed to drop 100 basis points. The logic of the op-ed piece? According to the article, this is how a Fed rate cut will help the economy:

“"[B]y stimulating the demand for housing, autos and other consumer durables; by encouraging a more competitive dollar to stimulate increased net exports; by raising share prices to increase both business investment and consumer spending; and by freeing up spendable cash for homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages."

Kevin does highlight other important bubble antics in the post and I recommend you read it if you have not done so. As you can see from the above perma-bull argument, we are now in some sort of claptrap; try to follow this convoluted logic, now that people are acknowledging a credit bubble the solution for all of this is for the Fed to cut rates and thus encourage further debt spending? What a fantastic plan! But wait, isn't massive speculation in housing and the credit markets the reason we are experiencing this credit crunch? Why doesn’t the Fed just drop rates to 0 and be done with the dollar? They want to institutionalize a new paradigm of credit induced spending. No one seems to notice that oil is at an all time high and gold is at multi-decade highs. I wonder if inflation has anything to do with it? Not according to the data gatekeepers.

The last article generated a lot of buzz and polarized readers. The data used was pulled from the Census Bureau, Edmunds, and other public sources. It wasn't made up as some readers thought; you can verify the data yourself. The minutia is besides the point. The main message of the article was to highlight some reasons people go into major debt especially in high priced metro areas. Some readers from other states saw this as typical overspending by Californians and said, "what does this have to do with me?" Quite a bit. Many mortgage, construction, finance, and retail sectors that are getting impacted are located in multiple states throughout this country. And with 36,457,549 people or 12.17 percent of the entire US population, California has a large impact on many neighboring states (look at Nevada and Arizona for immediate results). Some folks jumped to the conclusion that everyone spends like this and this was the prototypical household budget; not everyone spends like this, but many do. And yes, not all debt is bad. For example, using a mortgage to buy a rental property that cash flows. This is good debt. Buying a $50,000 car that depreciates once you leave the lot is bad debt. Paying for a top rated university education, good debt. Buying a Real Home of Genius, bad debt. You get the point.

Many factors are converging to pop this housing bubble especially in California. This Real Home of Genius demonstrates that many banks are going to get aggressive in their price-cutting to move inventory. We can coin this as the post-summer housing blues. Since summer is typically the strongest selling season and many sellers figured they would have a time horizon from June to September, we are now going to see a rush to unload short-sales and REOs during the worst selling seasons, fall and winter. Compound that with the current credit crunch, peyote induced housing prices, and growing inventory and you have a recipe for a housing bear market. Many sellers may be oblivious to all that is going on around them. I doubt the majority of folks spend their time scouring housing reports and digging into government data to time the housing market. Even though the majority of the population gets their housing knowledge from mainstream outlets, banks and lenders have a better overall picture of what is going to happen (after all, these are the people that will now need to unload massive amounts of inventory). Why do you think major housing lenders are trimming down to a barebones model? They are gearing up for survival mode. And this particular home isn’t an exception so get ready for some aggressive pricing moves in the next few months which will knock the median prices even lower. I already went on record saying that each Southern California County will have a negative year-over-year median price according to DataQuick by the end of the year. How can the outcome be any different?


Today we salute you Downey with our Real Homes of Genius Award.



Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

September 11, 2007

The Invisible Mortgage Hand: Analysis of a Society That Forces You Into Debt.


The Ministry of Truth, otherwise known at the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, tells us that inflation is low to moderate. In fact, inflation is so low all you need to do is purchase 10-year Treasury notes and you’ll be fine. But we do have inflation and this is apparent in the credit markets. We live in a society were folks are forced to go into debt. Instead of addressing our negative savings rate, corporate America decides to create credit products that will put you even further in debt. They use the machines of marketing to subtly make you feel that having 10 credit cards, student loan debt, and steroid induced mortgages is okay. In fact, if you don’t have these products you are some loser flunky that simply doesn’t understand success 2.0 in this country. I’m sure many of you have seen the current spin of advertising. Have you seen the commercials where anyone paying with cash at the mall, fast food store, or ball game is seen as some slow scumbag? The subconscious message is this, “hey, you are a lowlife if you carry infectious cash, pay with a credit card and GET IN LINE!” So what if you want to pay with cash. In fact, you should get kudos for doing this since it demonstrates that you are paying with real world money instead of mortgaging your future for a cup of espresso.

We are going to examine how our society by default forces people into debt. We are going to look at credit scores and why there is pressure to maintain a high 3 digit number. 80 percent of millionaires in this country have a college degree so we will look at the cost of going to college. Many people live out in the boondocks and commute to work so we’ll examine our driving culture. Most people eat and don’t live off air, so we’ll dig into our eating cost. And most of us need to live somewhere so we’ll take a look at housing cost.

The Good Character Factory, Credit Scores

Most people realize that they need to have good credit. In a society run by information gathering and data mining, most of what you do can be tracked. Many insurance companies will use your credit score in determining your insurance rates. Some employers will run your credit as a method of determining your character. They can easily call references and ask you to submit official documentation but 3 digits are a much better representation of who you are. In fact, folks are sometimes penalized for canceling credit cards because their debt ratios fall lower than they would like. You aren’t carrying around enough credit insurance. And if you are looking for a rental property, your credit score may determine whether you get the place you want. Relying on one single measure for character judgment is as useful as examining GPA for financial success. They are both important but relying on one single measure for all the important financial things in life is dangerous. There are technically 3 items in measuring credit worthiness; character, capacity, and collateral. In today’s market fogging a vanity mirror means you are credit worthy.

Then we have the opposite extreme with the subprime debacle. Even though folks have horrendous FICO scores that looked more like baseball batting averages, mortgage lenders decided it would be prudent to issue out $500,000 exotic mortgages. In this case, greed is more powerful than a credit rating. And now these companies are surprised that someone with a $40,000 annual income doesn’t have the character to pay back a $4,000 monthly mortgage payment. Maybe people should of thought of that instead of churning higher commission cuts. Believe it or not, getting credit is still not that hard even with all the talk about a tightening market. If you doubt this just take a look at all the spam in your e-mail box. Or you can see that credit card companies are still offering low rates in your snail mail. Credit scores also impact the interest rate on your auto, home, and credit cards and over a lifetime, this can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars. And don’t think we haven’t had any historical warning. Let us take a look at some famous credit quotes:

Neither a borrower nor a lender be,
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
William Shakespeare (Hamlet 1:3)

One of the greatest disservices you can do a man is to lend him money that he can't pay back. Jesse Holman Jones

Lending money to someone that can’t pay is wrong on so many fronts. We can yell personal responsibility but never in our history have people been able to have access to so much credit with such little repercussions for lenders and borrowers. Lenders are now screaming for a handout. Why don’t we audit their underwriting standards and see if the people that got these absurd loans had sufficient income and good credit since they are so married to these tools? In fact, the government can amend their bailout corporate welfare by stipulating that only loans that met historical underwriting standards of 28 to 33 percent income to housing ratios and solid credit histories will be eligible for a bailout. In this credit bubble, character, capacity, and collateral were all thrown out the window.

Education Just Got More Expensive

The LA Times has a great story about families wrestling with the college price tag. Amazingly, some private institutions annual fees cost more than the median income of the American family. So what to do? Go into debt or forego a college education (which we already mentioned that 80 percent of millionaires have a college degree). They have a fantastic chart breaking down the numbers for a 4 year degree. I’ll summarize the annual cost here which include tuition, housing, books, and transportation:

Georgetown: $51,290 (Private 4 year)

UCLA: $23,301 (Public 4 year)

Cal State Long Beach: $17,228 (Public 4 year)

Pasadena City College: $13,776 (Community College)

A student graduating from Georgetown paying down $20,000 a year, will end up borrowing $140,996. If they want to pay off their student loan in 10 years they will need to fork over $1,711 a month assuming 8% student loan rates. Now assume this student goes to Georgetown and comes out making $50,000 per year. Chances are many of these people will want to go further and pursue graduate school. Many top law and business schools will cost $50,000 per year. So we add another $150,000 in debt unless they have someone to help with these payments.

As you can see, many future undergraduates will come out with amazingly high student debt. We’re not talking about $10,000 or $15,000. We are talking about mortgage level debt. And what if they want to buy a home? More debt! Debt, debt, debt. Its as if we are programming the future of America with this mentality that to get ahead, you are forced to go into debt. And for many students that come from lower to middle class families they have no choice. Well they do have a choice, either forego college or sign away for loans. The LA Times article also breaks the misconception of many parents sending kids to public 4 year institutions. Even though it is cheaper, competition is stiff and class sizes may not be as accommodating as a private school. It is a hard challenge and I don’t envy parents of today sending their kids off to school.

What is The Median National Income?

The median family income for US households is $46,326. How in the world will the median family (which means half fall below and half fall above) near the median be able to send their children to college without saddling up debt? As you can see our society is almost completely based on credit. For those that don’t have wealth reserves, you must bite the bullet and take student loan debt, mortgage debt, and credit card debt. Of course, you shouldn’t spend beyond your means. But even if you have a distaste for credit you still need a strong credit score for better mortgage rates, lower insurance premiums, and sometimes a nosy employer.

But something doesn’t seem right with the median family income. How can it be that the annual price of college looms over the annual family median income? Many stories are hitting the newswires about students graduating and struggling to manage their debt. Many turn to using credit cards to stay afloat. And the vicious cycle of debt goes on and on. To breakdown the numbers further on income, I wrote an article on affluence in America. Here are some stats breaking down the numbers further:

Household income (overall percent of US households over):

Percent of Households over:

$65,000 34.72%

$80,000 25.6%

$91,705 20.0%

$100,000 17.8%

$118,200 10%

$166,200 5%

$200,000 2.67%

$250,000 1.5%

$1,600,000 0.12%

Even families making $100,000 a year, only 17.8 percent of all US households, will still have a challenge sending their kids to a 4 year private college. And most people want the best for their kids so they are not likely to scrimp in this arena. This isn’t a choice between a Camry and a Hummer, this is your child’s future. And here is a nice caveat, student loan debt is not wiped out by bankruptcy. And now imagine this hypothetical family sending a child off to college and carrying a $400,000 mortgage on a home. Do you think folks in these Real Homes of Genius even have the income to support their home loan? Too much credit floating around.

4 Wheels of Credit

We are a car loving society. So many car makes and models exist that you can assign each letter of the alphabet and still have remaining vehicles unnamed. Driving around on the freeways, you would think that hardly any person drives a car older then 3 years. But what is the average cost for all this? According to Edmunds the average car loan in 2003 is $23,801. And according to this same survey the average monthly payment is $447. This isn’t factoring insurance and fuel cost. Insurance cost can easily be $1,200+ year for a new car and fuel cost can be $150 to $250 per month. And unless you live in New York City or relatively close to your work, public transportation is not an option unless you want to spend extra hours.

Do we Really Need to Eat?

You rarely hear about the monthly cost of eating. But let us take a look at some data put out by Claritas regarding yearly eating habits for California families:

Cereal: $342

Bakery products: $667

Seafood: $170

Meat: $1,286

Fruits and Vegetables: $915

Juices: $229

Sugar and other sweets: $427

Fats and oils: $64

Nonalcholic beverages: $703

Prepared foods: 1,252

Fresh mild and cream: $179

Eggs: $103

Other Dairy products: $436

Annual cost: $6,773

Keep in mind this doesn’t factor in dining out. According to Restaurant.org:

“Consumers with a household income of $75,000 or more eat an average of 4.9 commercially prepared meals per week, compared with 3.2 meals for those with an income of less than $15,000. Close to two-thirds of individuals with a household income of $75,000 or more report eating at least one commercially prepared lunch per week, compared with one out of five consumers with an income of less than $15,000.”

So clearly the more you make the more you eat out. If you eat at a restaurant once a week with your family, it can easily cost you $50 with gratuity. So that is an added $200 per month on the lower end.

Putting It All Together

And how can we forget the median cost for a single family residential home in Los Angeles County. Even though the bubble is bursting, the median price for a SFR in LA County still sits at $547,500. So let us run a hypothetical budget using all these expenses from college, car, eating, and a mortgage payment. Let us assume that we buy the median home, send our kid to college and offer them $20,000 per year, have 2 average cars in our household, and eat the average amount of food. How will our budget look?

Monthly Budget

PITI: $4,100 (Putting down $54,750 on $547,500 and using current jumbo rates on a $492,750.00 mortgage - 30 year fixed conventional financing)

Auto Loan Cost: $894 (2 cars with each carrying a $447 monthly loan).

Auto Insurance Cost: $160 (2 cars full coverage)

Fuel Cost: $300 (assuming that we only use $150 per vehicle)

Food Budget: $564

Dining Out: $200

College Support: $1,667 (Providing our kid $20,000 a year support to attend a 4 year private school)

Utilities: $120 (includes Gas, Electric, and basic phone service)

Credit Card Service Debt: $168 (According to Bankrate, average household credit card debt of $8,400)

Health care cost: $575 (Lower approximation for a family of four full coverage, according to The National Coalition on Health Care.)

Total Monthly Expenses: $8,748 or $104,976 annually.

Is it any wonder that we are in a massive credit bubble? Helps us understand why we have a negative national savings rate. And I am hard pressed to believe that the above looks like low to moderate inflation. The game is rigged and forces everyone to go into some sort of debt.

How do these numbers compare to your household budget?



Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

September 08, 2007

Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.


Countrywide took what seems to be am emerging trend from the playbook of public relation spinning and market damage control for many housing related companies. On Friday, after the stock market had closed and took a beating because projections for 110,000 added jobs turned out to be a net loss of 4,000 (the first loss in 4 years), Countrywide waited until the market was closed and released a statement that it is looking at cutting 10,000 to 12,000 people from its workforce in the coming months. American Home Mortgage also used this last minute end of the week heroics when they announced they would be holding back on their dividend. We know how that story goes. Many folks in lower to moderate priced areas throughout this country are scratching their heads wondering why things are deteriorating over night. They hear about derivates, collateralized debt obligations, hedge funds, foreclosures, private equity firms, and wonder how can a simple thing like a home, turn into the beacon of mass speculation guiding us head on into a recession? Oh, let us count the 768 ways. Today we salute you Paramount with our Real Home of Genius Award.

Flipping ain’t an easy job and someone has to do it. This spectacular 2 bedroom 1 bath home is what we call in Los Angeles, posh living. With 768 square feet, you’ll be wondering what to do with all the extra space. In fact, we are told that this place has an “open kitchen that flows into the living room.” I’m not sure if that means you’ll be able to watch TV in your recliner while reaching over to open the refrigerator to grab a beer, all without getting up. This place according to the ad is a “fixer” so you can mold this place into your ideal dream home. The price tag? Only $324,900 or $423 per square foot. Look at the bright side, this place now qualifies for FHA financing. Are you sold? Well let us look at the previous sales data:

Sale History:

05/10/2006: $415,000

09/19/2005: $47,000

03/30/2005: $340,000

This is where you see the symptoms of the housing mess we are currently living in by jumping into the trenches. First, the home was artificially high in 2005 for the area. Then, 6 months after the purchase we have the fabled housing ATM machine being used for mortgage equity withdrawals. These folks probably realized that they bit off more than they could chew so what do they do? They simply listed a price that would cover the mess, sort of like sweeping dirt under the rug. Don’t think this is the case? Let us do the math:

Since they probably went zero down with some sort of banana republic financing the math works out as follows: Mortgage #1 ($340,000) + Mortgage #2 ($47,000) + 6 percent selling cost ($24,900) = $411,900

Hey, this figure is really close to the sales price in 2006, what a shocker. Since we were living in Wonderland and people simply priced homes at whatever they needed to get out of their chaos, this tactic worked in a bubblicious environment. In this example, these folks actually made a few thousand dollars even though they were digging deeper and deeper into debt. They had the benefit of being at the right place at the right time. This isn’t the case for the buyer in 2006. Some lending institution thought it would be a brilliant idea to lend $415,000 for a home that would rent for $1,100. Does this make sense? Of course not. You don’t need your Ph.D. in Finance to know this deal is not going to work. In fact, let us take a look at the neighborhood statistics:

Average Annual Household Income: $48,991

Let us run the hypothetical numbers of the average family in this neighborhood buying this home with conventional financing:

Monthly Net Income: $3,324 (Filing Married with 2 Exemptions for Federal and State).

PITI: $2,864 (5 percent down payment of $20,750, 95 percent LTV)

So this family has monthly disposable income of $460 for a 768 square foot home built in the Great Depression! What about automobile costs? Food? Healthcare? After all, they are only spending a mind numbing 86 percent of their net income on their home! And we aren’t including maintenance cost such as gardening, trash, and other fees that sneak up on property owners. Is it any surprise foreclosures are exploding in California? Who in their right mind didn’t see a disaster like this coming? Now, the home is priced at $324,900 or $90,100 less. This is a whopping 21.7 percent decrease in one year, and that is assuming it sells for the current price which is doubtful because someone can rent a similar place for $1,100 as opposed to carrying a nut of $2,336 (at the current price). And why would a real estate investor buy this place? They would be negative cash flowing by $1,236 in a market where prices are trending downward. Is it becoming apparent why this housing market needs to correct and this is no minor bump in the road? Do you still think that a bail out is a smart idea? If it isn’t obvious that prices need to drop in certain areas by 40 to 50 percent then we may consider investing in an introductory finance course. Unless incomes in the area increase by 100 percent, prices will adjust lower now that lenders are being forced to use more conventional financing. In other words, prices have to reflect the income reality of the people in the immediate area. And reality is so passé after living in a fantasy world of easy credit and hyper speculation.

Today we salute you Paramount with our Real Homes of Genius Award.



Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.